Written and directed by Paolo Sorrentino (2015)
What would you say if a friend asked if Paolo Sorrentino’s
new movie Youth was worth seeing? “Of
course, well worth seeing if just for Michael Caine’s acting—his face and
delivery a perfected art.” The movie is about him, composer, maestro Fred
Ballinger, his life and his state of being in old age; the characters that link
to him—film director Mick Boyle (Harvey Keitel), Lena (Fred’s daughter, Rachel
Weisz), and Jimmy Tree (an American actor played by Paul Dano)—have universal stories
that serve as subplot threads. The array of peripheral characters who also
inhabit the Alpine Spa provide interest, humor, and curiosity, not unlike
the circus flavor of Fellini’s casts, and yet under this artist’s eye, the
palette is slower, quieter, art-museum rich, with longer focus on oddities,
eccentricities, and composed beauty, despite the clicking pace of scenes.
Sometimes the lines sound like lines, forced, not natural, but with the rich
and splendid visual accompaniments—our location steeped in sensual ambiances we
come to know like the spa-dwellers themselves—the occasionally contrived lines
slip by unnoticed or forgiven. It may also be that such banal utterances are
intended humorously, satirically.
The script is a masterpiece that allows the visual
components—the spa’s pools, steam and massage rooms, gracious lawns, alpine
walks amid waist-high wildflowers, tantalizing nightlife, and every other
luxurious amenity or stunning landscape imaginable—to come to life as if the
viewer was right there as a participant in the Elysian world managed by
longevity experts. Of course it’s not really paradise, since the inhabitants
bring all their worldly and human troubles to the place and attempt to work
them out in order to achieve what a film must achieve in two hours: resolution.
So, you can come to this film for Michael Caine’s phenomenal
achievement or to experience how an original and extraordinarily tight script
forms the basis of an artist’s film. But there is more to recognize in Youth, which is composition, the
singular item that creates art, that sets art apart from lesser works.
Composition—how it all fits together seamlessly and with such power that an
audience stops and stares, goes through a response process—is what
distinguishes art, from paintings and sculpture, to music and film, to
literature and architecture. That arresting, mesmerizing impact, which moves a
person’s spirit, soul, and emotions, whether because of tragedy, pathos, or the
rendering of sheer earthly essence (art for art's sake), is art. And so, we can also come to
Sorrentino’s latest movie to experience his art. While the script plays
along—with octogenarian Fred moving from apathy following his wife’s absence to
living in the world again (his resolution)—we are treated to another artist-composer’s
imagination, vision, and taste through multitudinous canvases, one of the best
toward the end of the movie, when 80-year-old Mick (Keitel) faces the end of
his directing genius, the end of his notable career, when his young actors
leave the spa on a train, their work unfinished, the script without an ending. But
that’s the true ending: Mick facing the loss of his future; the future being over
for him. He turns to the green alpine hillside next to the station and one by one the actresses in
his past movies appear, dotting the landscape and saying fragments of their
lines—actresses from every movie genre and in every conceivable costume. He is
their conductor, they are his orchestra (a parallel to Fred the composer and
conductor of Simple Songs from his
own past, and a pasture of cows in the present time). But all is now in the past for Mick; the future doesn’t exist
for him anymore, now that the actors have left, the script has no ending but
this, and his leading lady Brenda Morel (Jane Fonda) has told him what trash he
now produces. As he witnesses all the actresses on the hillside before him—the
culmination, or last review, of his life—a final face comes before him, very close to his own
face, and bears an expression of utmost hurt, hurt we interpret as caused by
Mick. Probably it is the face of his first love, his first wife. There is a pervasive quality to
the movie that suggests those first bonding loves that produce a family endure
as the deepest, most meaningful relationships, even if the marriages fall apart.
Again, youth and youthful dreams and ambitions made those bonds and family. Old age can't replicate it; it only happens in youth.
The film’s composition of scenes, its museum canvases, go on
and on and delight the mind and senses. This is a sensory tour, art for art’s
sake, but always with underlying meanings because of the script’s various
threads, if the viewer can follow the script, which is not really possible in
one screening as so many perfectly placed details fly by too fast. Then, there
are features in the movie that many audiences won’t get, though this doesn’t
detract from the overall power of Youth.
For instance, unless we look for an answer after seeing the movie, we don’t
know that one of the characters is the real-life soccer hero
Diego Maradona, an obese, ailing occupant of the imaginary spa, alive only
because of his accompanying oxygen machine. Characters in the film see Maradona
and marvel that he’s at the spa with them; kids outside the chain-link fence clamor for his
autograph. We know he must be somebody, hideous as he is with his fleshy back covered
in a Che Guevara tattoo, but the only clue we’re given
is when he flashes back to his great days on the green playing field with his
team and spectators cheering for him. Still, that doesn’t enlighten most
viewers to who he is, nor does Jimmy’s line: “The whole world knows you’re
left-handed.” Why is Maradona in the movie as one of the spa’s odd characters? Because
art comes from the individual’s vast store of experiences—random, pulled from
here and there without premeditation. These strands, images and snippets of dialogue,
feed through the unconscious mind and the imagination to emerge in a
composition, good or bad. For the ordinary viewer of Youth, Maradona is just another weird, physically ugly person at
the spa that we come to like as a certain suffering mascot. We cannot know
without reading afterwards that Sorrentino holds him dear as the symbol for
saving his own life. When he was 17, his parents died in a gas-leak accident
during a weekend away, and Sorrentino would have been with them except that he
insisted on staying in Naples to watch Maradona play.
While some of the spa characters carry no import besides
their universal human eccentricity (Felliniesque), others are symbols, such as the young
masseuse with a long Chinese braid coming from the top of her head and braces
on her pubescent teeth. We see her several times dancing in her room to a video,
her arms weaving like a multi-armed Hindu deity. She is Youth, the goddess of Youth, the statue of Youth, the way we have statues of Justice and Liberty.
When Fred—the protagonist—liberates himself from apathy and conducts his Simple Songs for the queen and Prince
Philip, his mind fleetingly goes to the girl, the symbol of youth, and also to
Mick, the symbol of old age and death. The girl and Mick are at each end of life’s
pole, as Fred conducts the music that had the most meaning to him in his life, made in youth (with the future ahead) and conducted in old age (with the past behind).
The script is tight because right from the beginning all the
little clues are there, foreshadowings, such as Fred reading the newspaper on
the spa lawn and noting a headline about Miss Universe, who will appear later. We regularly hear a few bars
of music played by a violin in one of the spa bedrooms, which later
turns out to be Fred’s “Simple Song #3.” The American actor Jimmy is studying
everyone at the spa as he works out “developing his next role” in a film, which
towards the end turns out to be a ghastly Hitler even Jimmy can't tolerate. Mick from the beginning
refers to Brenda Morel and how she’ll be fabulous in his new movie, paving the way for Brenda and Mick's own demise. Lena tells Fred,
her father, that he should take flowers to Mummy in Venice—where Fred conducted
for the last 20 years of his career. A blissful Buddhist monk makes a few
appearances and we hear joking about his ability to levitate, which plays out
later. A sad, plain prostitute comes to the spa with her mother from the
beginning and plays a role at the end with hapless, hopeless Mick—a walk holding hands.
We find out later from the spa’s psychiatrist that Mick’s lifelong idolized woman
(and also Fred’s)—Gilda Black—never slept with him. The most he achieved with
her was a walk holding hands. It must have been a more sublime moment in youth
than the act of sex for Mick to reenact it in his last moments.
The movie’s tiny, infinitesimal details fly by but are there
and feeding the overall richness of the story arc. When Fred conducts his Simple Songs at the end of the movie—looking
like a resolute man, one who is alive again—there are sounds in the music that refer back to earlier
scenes when he sat on the alpine hillside conducting cows wearing bells, with other wildlife “instruments” joining in (woodpeckers especially). Sounds (water) and music are naturally vital components of
this movie as all senses are employed richly and deeply in Sorrentino’s opus—visual,
sensual, aural—perhaps taste is omitted. We can feel and smell the heavenly
alpine meadows in full wildflower and lupine bloom, or the steep, crystal clear
mountains with remnants of snow—we breathe that healthful air. We hear often
that Mick’s final masterpiece is titled Life’s
Last Day. Then we see him in the field facing all his past actresses and understand
that this moment is his final work, and its Last Day title must have been an uncanny
premonition.
Father and daughter, Fred and Lena, have two nightmares. We
see scintillating S. Marco Square in Venice at nighttime—perhaps the most
evocative, romantic, and mysterious setting anywhere in the world. Then we see
the famous “acqua alta” shimmering over the piazza like a lake. Fred crosses
the water on a wooden walkway. He passes Miss Universe, who will appear later
in the movie—does anyone notice her face and recall it later, when she arrives
at the spa? No, it’s another one of those marvelous details in the script that
elude the viewer and for some audiences make the film a "series of vignettes" rather than the
brilliant continuum it is. Suddenly the acqua alta rises, slowly at first, bubbly, then
with all-consuming menace, and Fred, up to his neck cries out, “Melanie!” and
wakes. The viewer misses yet another lovely detail—that Fred called out for
Melanie. We just hear him cry out as he wakes in bed, the cut moves so fast. Fred’s journey in the
movie is about processing his complicated marriage to Melanie (a universal) and his loss of
her in his current life of apathy, his old age.
Lena’s sexy husband Julian (Ed Stoppard) leaves her for the
pop singer Paloma Faith, because Paloma’s “really good in bed.” Lena dreams of Julian
and Paloma’s wild, combustible lovemaking in a sports car recklessly swerving along
a treacherous cliffside road, until she wakes in a terrified sweat to be
comforted by her father in the next bed. The father-daughter thread in the
story also finds resolution, showing that Fred understands Lena by DNA osmosis and that Lena
can love more than resent Fred. Parent relationships, all relationships for
that matter, find a moment to be pondered in the movie through various
characters.
Any art that goes deep enough to be art can’t avoid
sentimentality, but sentimentality comes in effective or embarrassing forms,
and in Youth, it succeeds, although toward
the end of the film after Jimmy says he can’t play Hitler, the music comes on
with borderline sentimentality and jars the discerning viewer. As in all of
Sorrentino’s movies, music plays a dynamic role.
I missed things—what did the psychiatrist say to Fred about
Mick and “youth” in their last scene together. The lines were obscured, muffled, and
since they involved the word “youth,” I felt deprived of a possibly important
line. On the other hand, such pronouncements and occasional philosophical
exchanges between characters (on levity, for instance) didn’t add anything to the picture’s
impact. Another question remained for me: Who was the ambiguous naked man in an early
scene when the young prostitute leaves his room? Later, when Mick has two encounters with the prostitute, I wanted to know if that naked man was supposed
to be Mick or a random spa dweller.
Do we need spas? The patrons at this spa are unsmiling and
when recuperating in their heated pools or saunas, a melancholy surrounds them.
At the nighttime entertainment, only the young dance and smile. The elderly sit
in chairs surrounding the stage watching, remembering. We are reminded how
youth begins with laughter, ambition, risks, and as life moves on and the
future diminishes and the past enlarges, melancholy seeps in, lips turn flat or downward. We’re treated to
examples of this dichotomy throughout the film. Brenda Morel (Jane
Fonda) gives a fabulous performance, her youthful, sex-symbol past behind her
with only her gharish vulgarity remaining. Maradona nearly chokes to death demonstrating
his famed coordination when he kicks a tennis ball high in the air repeatedly
without letting it drop to the ground, and one time bouncing it off the
enormous hard drum of his stomach. And in one of the film’s most memorable scenes, Fred and Mick
lounge listlessly in the pool and then perk up, at least with their faces, as
Miss Universe slowly glides into the water, her bronzed and sculpted
body, her perfect breasts, like a visual miracle. Youth and age, bodies and age, sex and age, careers
and age, future versus death, all of this conundrum for the human psyche to ponder
fruitlessly saturates the film and gives it its title. But why not Elderly? Because the great human shine
is lost in those years, and youth is what human life is about—the creativity and beauty and
inspiration in youth, and most important, the love.
Sorrentino’s art is his own and that’s what makes Youth so satisfying—original art. Even
though it’s best not to try to label his art but simply enjoy it, marvel at it, it is his personal avant garde, or theater of the absurd, perhaps more than any other
element in the total make-up of his conception, that stands out for the pleasure it
delivers. Whether in the costumes chosen for a scene—Fred and Mick riding the
cable car to the mountain lodge in ridiculous, satirical attire—or caricatures
like the mute aging couple in the dining room who finally use their throats in wild
lovemaking against a forest tree, or the Buddhist monk who levitates to
omniscient heights backed by triumphal music, or even brief, outlandish
exchanges between characters—the film moves along its traditional story arc
punctuated by Sorrentino’s brand of the absurd—which encompasses a natural well-spring museum
beauty.
Relatedly, the heritage of Italian art
permeates Sorrentino's movies. His sets and scenes are the 21st century’s
expression of a long tradition that no other nationality has produced in the same
rich, colorful, sumptuous, masterful, and prolific vein. From interiors to
faces, Italian art has a fresh and inspiring interpretation. Sorrentino’s film work
is operatic, literary, and flows from a painter’s palette.
Terrific review/essay, Gail. I am unable to cite another review that captured the movie's message and beauty as well as yours. And the grafs on "composition" and "resolution" was damn near literary. As they say in my business, "you got it all." Thanks, and congratulations!
ReplyDeleteThank for such positive feedback. I love this filmmaker's work, and I guess you do too.
ReplyDelete