Featured at the Boston Festival of Films from Iran, January 18-29,
Museum of Fine Arts http://www.mfa.org
Asghar Farhadi’s new film The Salesman is a dark and deep exploration of traumatic personal
violation, and how it affects close relationships in the aftermath. Similar to his
Oscar-winning The Separation (2011),
in which the familiar human experience of divorce takes place within Iranian-Islamic
culture, The Salesman examines the
universal of “personal violation” within the same framework—characters view and
deal with “female temptation” according to their traditions, but all humans share
the same gut response to right and wrong.
As an audience, exploring the realm of personal violation isn’t
a pleasant experience, but The Salesman’s
fine craftsmanship makes it possible, from sympathetic characters, to
compelling scene changes and suspense, to integrating Arthur Miller’s play Death of a Salesman, in which the two young
protagonists—husband and wife actors Emad and Rana (Shahab Hosseini and Taraneh
Alidoosti)—perform as Willy and Linda during the weeks of their “violation” ordeal.
The movie begins as Emad and Rana move into a new apartment found
by their play’s director Babak (Babak Karimi), but it quickly evolves that the
former tenant, whose belongings are still in a room waiting to be picked up,
was a prostitute. The neighbors mention how glad they are she is gone. Emad
angrily confronts Babak about knowingly sending them to a contaminated bedroom
like that, and his outrage is one of the numerous manifestations of Iranian morality
in the film.
As the couple unpacks and settles in, one of the
prostitute’s clients (Mojgan) enters the apartment and gravely injures Rana
while she’s taking a shower, but he does not rape her. In fact, her head injury,
caused by his temptation of seeing her flesh, may have been accidental, because
as flees the scene of broken glass and blood, he leaves her a wad of money in
compensation. He also forgets his cell phone and car keys. The rest of the
movie concerns how Rana, Emad, Babak, and the new neighbors deal in different
ways with the terrifying violation that has occurred.
Islam’s view of women and modesty influences some of the
characters’ reactions, as Rana and the neighbors don’t want to go to the police
because that would cause the story to become public: Rana’s naked body exposed
to a man, including a second man, the neighbor, who rescued her in her
unconscious state. Rana, traumatized, has nowhere to go for psychological help
for the same reason—shame, modesty—and her terror of being left alone is so
acute that she follows Emad on his errands or to his day-job as a high school
teacher; at first she is also too disoriented to resume her role of Linda in Death of a Salesman. Emad is her only
source of succor, and she refuses to let him go to the police—his choice for
dealing with the crime. Their relationship develops deep stress as a result.
Since the police aren’t going to be the means for Emad to resolve his own sense
of violation, he must deal with justice—and his burning feelings of revenge—on
his own. His method of punishing the aging, ailing perpetrator Mojgan, whom he
tracks down, follows cultural norms: he will force Mojgan to admit his guilt to
his family—that shame and humiliation breaks the spirit.
The movie explores the psychological effects of violation
but also of being a victim. Rana’s a victim, Emad’s a victim, and in the end
the Mojgan is Emad’s victim. Ultimately, we viewers digest what we already
know: how unresolvable the emotions of personal violation and victimization are.
They live and churn relentlessly, destructively, within us; they distract and
disorganize the mind and create misery. Revenge is longed for but it can’t
alleviate horrific emotion and memory, nor can justice; no remedy exists for
the broiling, excruciating turmoil inside the sufferer. In Rana’s case, choosing
the path of forgiveness and mercy—an act of submission and letting the guilty
go free—is the only salve that might give her back a life, but is it a perpetually
haunted life?
Rana and Emad are not only permanently affected by violation
and victimization, each in his and her own way, but they also can never be the
same couple they once were. They might survive as a couple—that’s left
ambiguous—but if they do, they are changed people. Emad is harder, almost a
symbol of the regime’s moral authority—he no longer laughs easily with his
students but holds them rigidly to the book; ironically, as an actor once in the
opposition camp, he has become like the censors. Rana has become the vision of
Mary in the Pietà. We feel as “Willy and Linda” look at each other on the stage
in the movie’s last minutes that the true people within those characters are
diametrically opposed. This juxtapositioning of a woman’s nature as forgiving
and man’s as tougher not only reflects another Islamic belief but generally,
and true to the movie as a whole, a universal trait.
This handsomely shot and crafted film is all gloom and doom,
yet at the same time, it speaks of a classic human experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment